Andrew Allegedly Thought He Would Be a Better Ruler Than King Charles, Says New Report
A US intelligence report mentions Andrew's hatred for King Charles, which was exploited to run corrupt intelligence operations worldwide.
Another day, another scandal—and once again, the spotlight falls on disgraced Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. According to royal expert Tom Sykes, the former Duke of York allegedly believed he would make a better ruler than King Charles, all while relying on dubious methods. And on what basis? Sykes cites a confidential US intelligence report describing a deep vein of sibling rivalry, in which Mountbatten-Windsor's alleged hatred for his brother was exploited to carry out corrupt intelligence operations worldwide.
In an article for The Daily Beast, Sykes mentioned that the US intelligence assessment describes how Russian intelligence officers reportedly viewed Mountbatten-Windsor as the royal family's 'weak link.' A source told the Daily Mail that the Russians allegedly exploited the former prince's "sexual proclivities" and "long-standing hatred of his brother Charles" to use him as a front in providing legitimacy to corrupt operations worldwide. The belief wasn't just a minor opinion, as US security analysts reportedly saw Mountbatten-Windsor's view of Charles as weak and undeserving of authority as leverage for foreign officials to conduct intelligence operations within the EU, the US, and the UK.
For those unversed, Mountbatten-Windsor is alleged to have been involved in shady dealings to help the Russian intelligence services gain influence in Western capitals. On his Substack, royal expert Andrew Lownie penned, "I think he [Andrew] was greedy. He has no moral boundaries. He was operating entirely in his own self-interest, and he was giving people like Epstein whatever they wanted," stressing that the former prince was not coerced into participating. He also argued that the documents clearly mentioned that Mountbatten-Windsor was a 'willing participant' in these schemes in exchange for financial, sexual, and personal rewards.
Sykes and many others are not the only ones to have held on to this belief, as royal expert Angela Levine has also claimed that Mountbatten-Windsor allegedly viewed himself as superior to Charles. During an interview with Talk TV after his February 19 arrest, she revealed that the ex-prince "has been very superior, and he hasn't liked King Charles or Prince Charles." She added, "He [Andrew] always felt he would become a better king than his brother, who was actually the heir to the throne," arguing that Mountbatten-Windsor never actually cared about his country or the royal family.
Against that backdrop, Levine further expressed that even the King did not view his disgraced brother in a favorable light. She said, "He's [Andrew] not actually somebody that the King has liked very much. But the fact that he could behave so badly with no moral heavier…is shocking." According to her, the UK needed the royal family, and Mountbatten-Windsor was 'crushing it,' a 'terrible thing to do,' referring to his scandalous past with Jeffrey Epstein. Previously, royal experts have also alleged that Mountbatten-Windsor's alleged superiority complex was the result of the late Queen Elizabeth's lenient parenting and constant ignoring of his scandals.
