Home / FEATURES & SCANDALS / The Crown

Charles and the Royal Family's Forgotten Documentary That Landed the Crown in Hot Waters

The 'Royal Family' documentary, which aired in 1969, faced public ire for its perceived vulgar displays of wealth, power, and prejudice.

King Charles and Queen Elizabeth stand with the royal family to watch a flypast on the Buckingham Palace balcony. (Cover Image Source: Getty Images| Max Mumby/Indigo)
King Charles and Queen Elizabeth stand with the royal family to watch a flypast on the Buckingham Palace balcony. (Cover Image Source: Getty Images| Max Mumby/Indigo)

King Charles' voice in his new documentary carries more polish than protest, as he has used his position to remind people that the environment deserves care. His commitment to conservation was on display in his new eco-film, Finding Harmony: A King's Vision, which premiered on January 28 in Windsor Castle. While the work was widely praised, another royal documentary that aired 57 years ago faced public ire as it exposed the monarchy's perceived prejudice, power, and a desperate attempt to appear relatable.

Queen Elizabeth, Prince Philip, Princess Anne, and then-Prince Charles during the filming of the 'Royal Family' documentary. (Image Source: Getty Images| Hulton Archive)
Queen Elizabeth, Prince Philip, Princess Anne, and then-Prince Charles during the filming of the 'Royal Family' documentary. (Image Source: Getty Images| Hulton Archive)

The BBC special Royal Family documentary, which aired in 1969, was heavily criticized for lifting the curtain too far on royal life. What was intended as an attempt to modernize the monarchy and present the royals as relatable figures was seen as ordinary, and to some extent, indulgent. The film, shot over a period of years, featured the late Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, then-Prince Charles, Princess Anne, and other close family members through both public engagements and informal moments at home. Some scenes included family meals, leisure time, and behind-the-scenes preparations for duties, which many felt weakened the monarchy's maintained sense of distance.



Perhaps one of the most bizarre scenes, which underplayed everything else, was when the Queen was sitting with Philip, Charles, and Anne laughing about a past incident in which a government minister warned her that "there's a gorilla coming in." She recounted how hard she found it to keep a straight face. "What an extraordinary remark to make about someone – very unkind. I stood in the middle of the room and pressed the bell, and the doors opened, and there was a gorilla. He had a short body and long arms." At the time, it was presumed that she was talking about the US Ambassador to the UK, Walter Annenberg. The family's nonchalance and poor attitude landed them in hot water. 

Following the backlash, BBC and ITV withdrew it from repeated broadcasts, and the royal household restricted access to it. Copies were kept in archives, and only select clips resurfaced on social media. Although it was not banned by law, the royals swiftly noticed the mounting criticism and took action. Reflecting on the ill-received broadcast, royal historian Seth Leonard told HuffPost, "One imagines that in the late 1960s this televised display of wealth might not have been terribly wise from a public relations perspective, given the state of the British economy at that time."



Similarly, royal historian Carolyn Harris opined that openly showing the royal children was not a good look, as it was the duty of their parents to safeguard their privacy. She stressed, "It's unlikely that a program would be made with so many scenes of royal children playing together and expressing themselves spontaneously in front of the cameras." While echoes from nearly six decades ago cast the Crown in a controversial light, Charles's new documentary reinforced the monarchy's ability to wield its influence and platform for the greater good of society.

GET BREAKING ROYAL NEWS
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

More Stories

Documents revealing the former Duke of York flew to Epstein's mansion mid-fundraiser have left fans furious and demanding answers.
By Abha Anindita · 1 DAY AGO
Andrew, long known for his sense of entitlement, was allegedly resolved that his daughter's wedding would stand as an occasion befitting a princess of the blood.
By Abha Anindita · 1 DAY AGO
A former senior police officer explains why the raids on Royal Lodge were no accident — and what they suggest about where the investigation is heading.
By Abha Anindita · 2 DAYS AGO
According to former royal protection officer Dai Davies, Andrew's alleged demand once cost taxpayers a hefty sum of $133,584.
By Andrea Cutinho · 2 DAYS AGO
Campaigners installed tribute signs outside the palace honouring the late Epstein accuser, reigniting scrutiny of the duke’s past links to Jeffrey Epstein.
By Abha Anindita · 3 DAYS AGO
A newly unearthed email shows the shocking role Beatrice and Eugenie were meant to play in Fergie's business empire.
By Sakshi Singh · 3 DAYS AGO
A US intelligence report mentions Andrew's hatred for King Charles, which was exploited to run corrupt intelligence operations worldwide. 
By Andrea Cutinho · 4 DAYS AGO
Instead of distancing himself, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's emails show him eager to jump back into Jeffrey Epstein's inner circle.
By Sakshi Singh · 4 DAYS AGO
The author suggests establishment networks may have shielded the Duke of York for years.
By Abha Anindita · 5 DAYS AGO
Expert says the period that followed after Andrew's resignation was not one of reflection, but with the ex-Duke maintaining his old habits under a different guise.
By Sakshi Singh · 5 DAYS AGO