Home / OPINION

Beatrice and Eugenie Are Proof One Thing Has Changed in the Royal Family Since Harry and Meghan

The York sisters' current roles have fueled claims that the rules have always been different depending on who was asking.  

(L) Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice at St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle; (R) Prince Harry and Meghan Markle at Westminster Hall in London. Cover Image Source: Getty Images | (L) Max Mumby/Indigo; (R) Nariman El-Mofty - WPA Pool
(L) Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice at St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle; (R) Prince Harry and Meghan Markle at Westminster Hall in London. Cover Image Source: Getty Images | (L) Max Mumby/Indigo; (R) Nariman El-Mofty - WPA Pool

Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie's current standing within the Firm is increasingly being cited as proof that the royal family has quietly given in to a 'half-in, half-out' model. The monarchy once insisted that such an arrangement was impossible when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle sought it in 2020. Critics have called out the hypocrisy, arguing that the rules have always been different depending on who was asking.  

Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie attend a Christmas Lunch for members of the Royal Family, hosted by King Charles III, at Buckingham Palace (Image Source: Getty Images | Max Mumby/Indigo)
Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie attend a Christmas Lunch for members of the royal family, hosted by King Charles III, at Buckingham Palace. (Image Source: Getty Images | Max Mumby/Indigo)

Royal expert Simon Vigar addressed the contrast during an episode of The Sun’s Royal exclusive podcast. He noted that Beatrice and Eugenie have received leniency despite their father, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Jeffrey Epstein scandal. “They’re in an interesting position because they do public engagements, but they also have their private work and their private lives. They’re sort of half-in, half-out, actually, the thing that Harry wanted. Beatrice and Eugenie aren’t full-time working royals, so they don’t quite have the public exposure that the others do.”

The issue of exposure is precisely what forced the Sussexes to leave the royal fold. And despite the years of negative press since their exit, they remain popular among royal watchers. This was evident during their trip to Nigeria in May 2024. Royal author Tina Brown acknowledged their appeal and told the BBC at the time: “After all of the trashing of Harry this week… trying to blame him [for the rift]. When I saw him and Meghan in Nigeria, I had nostalgia. I felt this was what it could have been. These two, who are enormously appealing to the public and who are very good at it, were out there in Nigeria, sort of looking really attractive and being appealing people.”

Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Joshua Sammer
Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, during the closing ceremony of the Invictus Games Düsseldorf in Düsseldorf, Germany. (Image Source: Getty Images | Joshua Sammer)

Brown went on to argue that their decision to step back from royal duties created a vacuum within the monarchy. She added, “What a pity it is they’ve gone. There is that Harry-shaped hole in the monarchy at this time when they are in such beleaguered circumstances.” Her remarks shed light on why some insiders believe the Palace said no to offering the Sussexes a hybrid role; fear that they might eclipse the other senior working royals. 

In the couple’s docuseries, Harry & Meghan for Netflix, they laid bare the refusal again. Harry explained how they wanted to have their "own jobs but also work in support of the Queen.” However, the response to the same was immediate and hostile. He reflected, “It became very clear, very quickly, that that goal was not up for discussion or debate. It was terrifying to have my brother scream and shout at me, and my father say things that simply weren’t true, and my grandmother quietly sit there and sort of take it all in.” 

Image Source: Getty Images | Karwai Tang/WireImage
 Princess Beatrice of York and Princess Eugenie of York at Ascot Racecourse on June 21, 2018, in Ascot, United Kingdom. (Image Source: Getty Images | Karwai Tang/WireImage)

As 2026 unfolds, it marks almost five years since the Sussexes stepped back; the contrast has become difficult to ignore. Beatrice and Eugenie continue to balance their private careers with selective royal duties, while Harry and Markle remain permanently sidelined for seeking the same arrangement years earlier. 

GET BREAKING ROYAL NEWS
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

More Stories

King Charles is facing an extraordinary constitutional milestone that sets his reign apart: welcoming his fourth Prime Minister in less than four years.
By Alexander Seale · JUL 20, 2026
Prince William has big plans for the monarchy, but somehow the conversation always finds its way back to Prince Harry.
By Hrishita Das · AUG 6, 2026
Princess Kate and Prince William recently posted a family picture from the 2026 Glasgow Commonwealth Games, and it is uncannily similar to those of Meghan Markle's.
By Ira Deokule · AUG 5, 2026
We have received the news that Prince Harry intends to invite his father to the next Invictus Games due to be held in the UK next year.
By Joshua Rom · AUG 4, 2026
Charles and Camilla's latest royal outing had all the right intentions until one stopped to ponder the optics!
By Hrishita Das · JUL 10, 2026
The more we learn about Charles' support for Andrew, the harder it is to ignore Harry's side of the story.
By Hrishita Das · JUL 8, 2026
While Prince Harry's legal action is no different than other royals, he is being singled out and the reason could be something else entirely.
By Ira Deokule · JUL 6, 2026
A royal commentator claims the uncertainty surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's travel plans and security arrangements is placing King Charles in an increasingly difficult position.
By Mary Anthony · JUL 3, 2026
The Royal Family had finally found its footing after the Andrew saga, but two royal outings had just threatened to undo months of careful image-building.
By Hrishita Das · JUL 1, 2026
A royal expert says Harry's security is now less of a constitutional issue and more of a family responsibility for King Charles.
By Ira Deokule · JUN 29, 2026