Andrew 'Will Not Be Spared' While Others Remain Allegedly Protected From Epstein Files Release
The revelation comes as political pressure escalates for Andrew to testify before the US Congress about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
It's not just the royal family; even the US Government appears unwilling to overlook Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's controversial ties to Jeffrey Epstein. A November 6 letter from the US Congress urged the former Prince to assist in their investigation into Epstein's network. While he has remained mum, a new report claims that his lack of cooperation will have serious consequences. Despite alleged attempts to protect some politicians from the release of the Epstein files, Mountbatten-Windsor is not expected to receive such preferential protection.
According to the Mirror, while alleged efforts are being made to limit what becomes public of the files, Mountbatten-Windsor 'will not be spared' from the exposure. His victims' advocates argue that US Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel may invoke national security claims and cite ongoing criminal investigations in an effort to shield Epstein's associates. However, they insist the former Prince will not be receiving any form of protection. A US official with insider knowledge said, "This isn't Britain. There is no royal exemption, no special secrecy clause." The files are reportedly held across the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security.
The Epstein files allegedly contain surveillance logs, interview transcripts, operational notes, and the flight records of the disgraced financier's longest-serving pilot, Larry Visoski, which have so far remained sealed. While one of the accounts from Epstein's pilot, David Rodgers, pointedly named Mountbatten-Windsor on the infamous 'Lolita Express,' Visoski's records are reportedly far from damaging. An insider revealed, "Visoski flew many more trips to various destinations, with numerous VIPs. Those records are expected to name individuals not previously linked to Epstein's movements, and yes, Andrew is on them."
Visoski's bombshell revelations would certainly paint the former Duke in a bad light. Meanwhile, Mountbatten-Windsor's allies allegedly fear he is being 'scapegoated' by an American process that is beyond his control. Pressure intensified after Keir Starmer broke convention by commenting while at the G20 summit in South Africa, "Anybody who has got relevant information in relation to these kinds of cases should give evidence." When asked whether that applied to the former Prince, he replied, "If you have relevant information, you should be prepared to share it." Attempts to block the files are also said to be in vain, as a source puts it, "The Senate can stall. The White House can stall. But the files will come out, and when they do, all manner of names will be visible."
On November 6, a letter from the US Congress urged Mountbatten-Windsor to appear before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform for a transcribed interview. The committee's members, led by Representatives Robert Garcia and Suhas Subramanyam, said in a statement that his participation could be important in uncovering the truth behind Epstein's criminal actions. While the former Duke continues to deny all allegations against him, the correspondence places renewed scrutiny on his role within a scandal that refuses to fade.
